thankyou Gandhiji
Violence--as these past few days have shown--always begets more violence.
I'm honestly not sure how it all started--but a controversial former UCK leader was given a prominent position in the department of defense (he's now a politician. oh some things never change) and there were protests (the UCK is taking over the army, and that kind of nonsense). and then there were some mysterious beatings of school children by uber-nationalist Macedonians--and then counterprotests by probably nationalist Albanians which got heated (a bus got burned, some arrests, some injured).
So on a philosophical/life-being way I can't comprehend what is happening around me. but, what's even more frustrating and saddening is that the response I hear from so many--especially young people--is "oh. this happens every year, or around election time. it's no big deal [read: why are you concerned about this? you silly American]. it's just the way things work here. Macedonians and Albanians--well, we always fight." like it's programmed into the DNA here or something.
and my knee-jerk reaction is "I can't believe that--violence isn't genetic" but when I stop and think for a moment--the weight of that kind of statement really hits me. violence is so normalized that people just pass it off as pre-election tension, or hooligans or just the way things work. (It's especially aggravating when people start with the sentence "What do you expect, this is the Balkans?). If it's become so normalized, so internalized--how do we raise enough critical consciousness to question, to reject, to change this kind of behavior? and without that fundamental rejection of violence as the solution (or even as a solution) how, tell me how, can there be living breathing peace? here or anywhere.
So yes "I believe in non-violence and I believe in praxis"
I'm just not quite sure how to get there.
Last week for one of my classes we "read" (we is perhaps a too inclusive pronoun--some of us read, some only downloaded) Keith Basso's "Stalking with Stories"--which develops a hunting metaphore for using stories/stories rooted in place and place names to teach/impart the moral/social values of the Western Apache (within the community as a way of reifying what it means to "be," to practice Apache). it's a beautiful piece and I highly recommend it to any and all--and will gladly hook you up with a copy if you like. when a person has transgressed, someone, usually an elder in the community will "shoot them with a story"--a narrative of an event, somehow parallel to this particular event or action, set in a specific locale in the community. linking the place with the story (and more importantly the moral message contained within the story) serves as a way for the individual to think of that story (and their misdeeds) every time they see that place, or hear it's name (god it's beautiful. embodied/embedded reflective practice). these arrows, these stories "work on you," helping you see your own errors, and change your (evil) ways through this link between self, place, community.
But I also see how in order for these stories to effectively stalk you--in order for you to "meet" the other, to use Vahido's language--you have to hear them.
Hear as an active not a passive verb--to let the words in, to let them work their magic on you.
to be able to hear something that may challenge you--what you believe, or see, think or do. it takes a certain kind of willingness to hear criticism or challenges in a productive manner--it's far too easy to ignore them all together, or to get defensive. and it's a totally self-directed process, I can't force someone else to hear me, to reflect, take ownership of their past mistakes--or to try to change themselves. it comes from within. you have to, in a way, let yourself be hit by the arrow. agree to be hunted.
and people who have that strength, that courage, that love to truly transform themselves--
I am in awe of you.
the question is what we will learn from it.
No comments:
Post a Comment